Some books are terrible. They really are. You read their book them and all the while you’re
fighting a great urge to google the author, find out their address, drive over
there and urge them to throw out their pen in favour of contributing something
worthwhile. Then there are some books
that are wonderful, quires of awesome pages that make you happy to be
alive. Most books aren't either of these
things. Most fall under categories of
are ‘quite good’, ‘okay’, ‘rather fun but’ and so on. Occasionally though you find a book where you
finish reading it and you’re not sure what to think. You’re aware that you managed to finish it,
so it can’t have been awful (or worse incredibly dull). You’re also aware that it didn't
excite/thrill you or make you laugh much/cry.
It feels wrong to call them ‘average’ or ‘decent’ because you’re not
sure if they could have been better or worse than that. They are, in short, a nightmare to review and
usually end up taking up a lot of my time because gathering my thoughts takes
rather a long time. For me, Robert
Goddard’s new book The Ways of the World
falls right into this category and if you’ll bear with me (and I promise this
isn't going to be too rambling) I’ll explain why.
Robert Goddard is a very experienced author having published
24 books including this one, largely focussed on the Crime and Mystery genre. This book is set in Paris during the Armistice
Treaty negotiations after the Great War.
The hero is James ‘Max’ Maxted, a veteran airman whose diplomat father
was killed in suspicious circumstances at the house of his mistress. Although the Paris police write the death off
as an accident, Max, against the will of pretty much everyone, seeks to find
out the truth. This predictably ends up
getting him into all sorts of trouble with people ranging from Russian
Monarchists, German spies and the British diplomatic service. He finds help along the way, but he is very
much the amateur sleuth, cleverly but clumsily eking his way towards the truth
while pushing back against the obstacles placed in his path.
The author, as one would expect from someone so experienced, writes well in an engaging style, feeding you information as you go along little by little, allowing you to form your own suspicions in very much the way that the characters do. His characters, if a little bit caricatured, are interesting with decent development throughout. The only real criticism that I would throw his way is his constant need to throw in phrases/sentences in French. Now I, luckily, speak quite good French and had no difficulty parsing these sections and I would imagine that most people would be able to get the gist of most of them, but it would have been nice if he’d been a little more nuanced. It would not be hard to make the translations easier to work out through the English dialogue that surrounds it. Other authors do it well and Goddard’s refusal to do so smacks me a little of arrogance.
Other than that I have no real criticisms of this book and
so you may be wondering why I’m so conflicted over how to come to an opinion
over it. The problem is that I can’t for
the life of me work out whether or not it is any good. I enjoyed reading it without it really having
any significant affect on my heart-rate or on my emotions. It was well-structured and came to a good
ending, but it didn’t really leave me wanting more though nor did it leave me
disappointed. The book isn’t bland
per-sé but it lacks punch or zest. I
could of course be being very harsh here.
From other reviews on the wild-world of the internet I see that this
book has attracted reasonable praise and has sold quite well, but I wonder how
much of this is because of the man and not the book. I would encourage people to give this book a
go, if nothing else because I’d be intrigued to have a conversation with
someone who’s not as conflicted as me over it.
6/10 (I think)
No comments:
Post a Comment