Saturday, 26 April 2014

Racing Through the Dark: The Fall and Rise of David Millar - David Millar

You say the word ‘Tour de France’ to someone and the chances are that their minds won’t be drawn to the endurance, resilience and glory attached to cycling’s blue riband event; they will instead think of people like Lance Armstrong, Alberto Contador and Floyd Landis.  Drug Cheats.  There is no sport in the world that is more associated or blighted by the scourge of doping than professional road cycling, and it has brought the sport to its knees many occasions.  Heroes have been cut down and records rewritten as champion after champion has been revealed to have been under the influence of performance enhancing narcotics.  We now appear to have reached the other side of the tunnel, but the stain will never truly be removed.

One such man caught out was the British cyclist David Millar.  Before Bradley Wiggins and Chris Froome announced Britain as one of road cycling’s superpowers, Millar was the golden boy of UK cycling.  A Tour De France stage winner and a World Road Race Champion, he seemed destined for Olympic glory and maybe even to be Britain’s first ever Tour de France winner.  That was until in 2004 when he was arrested, admitted to taking EPO – a blood boosting drug – and was banned for two years. Racing Through the Dark: The Fall and Rise of David Millar is his story.

I have said before that I am not usually one for memoirs.  I generally find them self-serving attempts to justify the author’s actions which rarely offer any kind of genuinely interesting insight.  There are a few exceptions to this, and this book is definitely one of them.  Racing Through the Dark is an honest and sometimes harrowing tale of how the youthful idealism of a young up-coming cyclist can be eroded by the dark under-belly of a sport rotten to the core and in doing so asks some very real questions about how we treat dopers in modern sport.


David Millar is that rarest of beings: a drug cheat who came clean (admittedly while under arrest) and who did not spend years lying to the authorities and the world (see Armstrong, Landis etc).  The book is brutally honest – a truly introspective look into the ‘hows’ and ‘whys’ of doping.  He does not seek to excuse, merely to explain.  The book takes us from his early years of broken family and infatuation with the sport of cycling, through his amateur and professional career up to 2011 which was when the book was published.  Millar starts as a torch-bearer of the ‘clean cyclists’; someone who refused to dope even while nearly everyone else around him was, yet eventually he succumbed.  It is profoundly distressing to see such a man broken by the pressures and forces us to question what we would have done?  If the playing field is so tilted and your career depends on success, can you really justify not doping?  As he says: “If the riders, governing bodies, teams, race organisers and media weren't doing anything about it, then what the hell could I, a 20-year-old neo-pro from Scotland, do about it?”

Millar’s honest writing style makes this sometimes quite a hard book to read.  It is not particularly pleasant to see such a man fall in so ignominious a way – yet it is the only way that this book could function; no one wants to read a flattering account of a drug cheat.  So many memoirs are so heavily ghost-written that they contain little-to-no insight, or are so rose-tinted as to be completely opaque: not so this. 

Something that I found myself contemplating while reading the book was about the very system of punishment.  The reason for giving bans for doping is threefold: to deter would-be dopers by showing that their actions have consequences, to take them out of the sport so that clean riders have a fair shot, and to re-habilitate them back into the sport.  In this way it is much like the criminal justice system itself, yet the attitude pervasive in British sport in particular is very much a ‘throw away the key’ mentality.  What Millar represents in this book is a man for whom the system has – eventually – worked; a man reformed through a no-nonsense attitude in his national federation and through the humiliation of being caught and the consequences for his career.  It made me question my own ‘throw away the key’ attitude as well, and a book that makes me question my own beliefs in any way is certainly something worth reading.

This book may now be a little old, but it is still worth a read.   It tails off a little towards the end in his redemption arc, but that is the harshest criticism that I can give it.  Cycling fans in particular will love it, but the story of a flawed, fallen hero is so universal as to make it suitable to anyone.  Much like Millar’s career, it is not always easy but thoroughly worth it in the end.

7.5/10

Favourite Quotes

“The past is as important as the future, but we only live in the here and now.”

“The manner in which one loses the battle can sometimes outshine the victory.”

“What an idiot I'd been. What a spoilt brat. What a bloody fool.”
Read More »

Thursday, 10 April 2014

Life after Life - Kate Atkinson


In The Wizard of Oz, Glinda offers Dorothy some very sound advice: “It's always best to start at the beginning.”  This is not the vogue method in modern literature, with authors liking to start their stories at the end (The Book Thief), the middle (The Secret History) or in an undetermined part of the plot (The Time Traveller’s Wife).  Starting at the beginning has begun to see a little old-fashioned, unimaginative even.   What the latest book on my review list has done is go in the opposite direction, not only starting at the beginning, but going on to re-start at that beginning many times.  This is Kate Atkinson’s much praised new book Life after Life.



Life after Life is one of those books that grabs you right from the synopsis.  It is the story of a girl, Ursula Todd, who dies minutes after being born on a snowy night in 1910.  But what if she hadn’t?  The story briefly relates her death before moving onto this ‘what if’.  She later drowns in the sea as a small child, but what if this hadn’t happened?  This book, at its most basic level, is about these ‘what ifs’.  It is about how a life can be changed after making seemingly innocuous choices.  Ursula’s life shifts from dying during the Spanish Influenza, to an abusive marriage to a school teacher, to dying in the Blitz (several times) to being the wife of a high-ranking Nazi.  Upon every death we are brought back to snowy Middle England in 1910, but this repetitiveness does not become tiring, it grounds us in the new reality before the narrative moves on.

Ursula is dimly aware of these other lives, of her pre-incarnations, but is mostly powerless to stop her respective destinies.  Indeed this story is both a repudiation and confirmation of the very idea of destiny.  The fact that Ursula has multiple ends belies the fact that she is subject to the whims of fate.  Her choices – and the choices of others – set multiple wheels in motion and shows us just how powerless she – and we – are in determining the course of our own lives.  This is in my view the most interesting part of this novel: an examination of just how much control we have over our own fate.

This is the first of Kate Atkinson’s books that I have read, and I have to say that I was impressed.  Even though it has been critically praised, a work of this scope and ambition has always got the ability to divide as much as it pleases, and I can readily understand why some may dislike it.  It does require an investment in time, as it took me around 250 pages before I really understood what the book was about.  Some critics have criticised it for being just a more elaborate version of the Bill Murray film Groundhog Day, and while I can see how they came to this view, I have to disagree.  This book is far more than just a set of circumstances repeating themselves.

If you are looking for a gentle read on a warm summer’s eve then this is not it.  Urusla’s fates are rarely particularly contented, especially as they pretty much all lead to a premature demise.  She is one of the ‘golden generation’ of people whose lives were inextricably caught up in the First and Second World Wars and she struggles to escape either of them with her life intact.  Kurt Vonnegut in a piece giving advice to new authors recommends: “be a Sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them-in order that the reader may see what they are made of,” and Atkinson has really taken this to heart in this book.  Ursula, although the same person with the same personality, is shaped and bruised by the winds of fate in this story, and it is this brutal storytelling that compels the reader to keep going.  

This book is one about fate and destiny, and how despite the changing fortunes of Ursula in her many alternate lives, she is unable to plot her own course.  Merida in the Disney/Pixar film Brave dreams of taking her life into her own hands and ‘changing her fate’.  It is Ursula’s complete inability to do that is the cause of all the drama in Life after Life.  This was a tremendously ambitious project and one that I was worried that was impossible to pull off – but that I was largely proven wrong.  The story does take a while to get going and you have to have faith that the author will bring you round.  Once she does, it is an absolute treat.

8/10

Favourite Quotes

 “What if we had a chance to do it again and again, until we finally did get it right? Wouldn't that be wonderful?”

“She doesn't believe in dogs," Bridget said. "Dogs are hardly an article of faith," Sylvie said.”

“Her heart swelled with the high holiness of it all. Imminence was all around. She was both warrior and shining spear. She was a sword glinting in the depths of night, a lance of light piercing the darkness. There would be no mistakes this time.”

“Sometimes it was harder to change the past than it was the future.”

Read More »